Book and Film Reviews kategorisi arşivi

My Architect: The Documentary of Louis I. Kahn


This Documentary written and directed by Nathaniel Kahn paints a touching story of the search of his self identity through the investigation of the secret and public lives of his father, the famous architect Louis Kahn.
Nathaniel Kahn had little chance to know his father while growing up, and with this documentary his pursuit is completely devoted to learning from his father’s life, at getting to know him better, and by some means fill the void his father has left in his life.
Nathaniel elegantly combines his investigation of his father’s private life; Louis Kahn juggled between 3 families, and his exhausting proffessional standing. Nathaniel explores his family history with his interviews with his mother and 2 half sisters, from father Kahn’s wife and colleage. He is very sincere in trying to know them better, since he has grown up not knowing his father or of his other families very well.
With this documentary we see Louis Kahn as a man although very charming to women, not very successful with relationship or parenting issues, since he is completely devoted to his profession, architecture. He spends most of his time at his office nearly always sleeping there. But that is the price Louis Kahn pays to create timeless architectural masterpieces. He is consumed by his job and tries to find relaxation through the little time he spends with his 3 families.
Louis Kahn leaves several monumental architectural structures when he dies. One of them the Parliament Building of Bangladesh. He spends a lot his time travelling to Bangladesh and back during the process of this project.
Father Kahn dies in 1974, when Nathaniel is just 11 years old, ironically in a restroom at the Pennsylvania trainstation.
He leaves behind a heritage of great architectural buildings to be admired by new generation architects, a bankrupt office in 500,000$ in debt, and last but not least, a shattered life of 3 children one from his wife and 2 from 2 other long term relationships.

Share

, , , ,

2 Yorum

A melodramatic visit: In Bruges

How can a film be increadibly gloomy, funny, touching, artistically fulfilling, and, catching at the same time? With “In Bruges” we see it is possible. The film is both; a visual fiest of medeival architecture of the well preserved city of Bruges, and a good example of English black comedy.

The scenes of the city create a sublime atmosphere in the film, and overwhelm you to go there, and the dialogues, contradicting the atmosphere of the city, are full of slang and comic remarks displaying the humanistic side of two Irish hitmen trying, however failing, not to catch attention.

The language is goofy and sly, to the extent of mocking midgets and the Americans, and the acting is touching; especially Brendan Gleeson who plays the mature hitman Ken always looking out for his rookie partner Ray (Colin Farrell), who are two Irish hitmen told to “lay low” in Bruges for two weeks by their boss’, after a job that has gone terribly wrong.

It’s not surprising that the Director Martin McDonagh is an Irish play-writer who has won the Oscar for his short film “Six Shooter” last year. McDonagh has done a well job with his fellow Irishmen Farrell and Gleeson. Finally, Ralph Fiennes also displays some surprising acting. After we have gotten used to his sophisticated English accent and role accordingly, we see him as a Cockney speaking gangster boss from London, reminding us of Michael Caine.

The only bad thing about the movie is the poster. It underrates the quality of the film by presenting it as a thrilling action movie (which is what I thought it was). The poster also doesn’t give Brendan Gleeson the credits he deserves since he plays the pivot role of the whole film. However, as much as I like surprises, despite the promotion, this film well overcame my expectations.

This is one of the most impressive movies I’ve ever watched. I sincerely recommend “In Bruges” as a film of both artistic and cinematographic quality.

Share

, , ,

Yorum yok

Book Review; Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture (October Books)


When I first got my hands on this book by Slavoj Žižek, I wasn’t really aware of what to expect. I wasn’t actually interested in Lacan, however I new I was interested in popular culture and on of it’s effects on society.

The language of Slavoj Žižek is very fluent and glides you through contemporary media products from Stephen King’s “Pet Cemetary” to Hitchcock’s “The Trouble With Harry”, explaining these with a psychoanalitical (Lacanian) perspective. As in the title of the book, Žižek provides an alternative perspective to reading popular media products, and his depictions make you say “why didn’t I see that?” Although understanding Lacan from his own writings can be difficult Žižek makes it easy. You don’t have to be a scholar doing a Phd to understand Lacan when you read Žižek.

Other readers generally review “Looking Awry: An Introduction to Jacques Lacan through Popular Culture (October Books)” as a good guide to understanding Lacan. However, I found the book as a good source to a psychoanalytical reading of popular media culture by itself regardless of Lacanian study. You don’t need to be curious about Lacan to read this book. Everybody who has interest in media studies can gain much insight from what Žižek has to offer in his “awry” interpretations.

For a different perspective of popular culture I definitely suggest reading this book!

Share

, , , , ,

Yorum yok